For closing the "super commands": my VOTE is NO!. Maybe i surprise you with this, but im not against them. I hate superweapons and brutal "no solution" situations, thus those can absolutely kill the cooperative, tactic players's way of gameing. But these are not coming with the "super commands". They can rise the game experience, give chances and so.
Sometimes, mainly when there is only a few players in game, a FLAG party can be very good - it can speed up the play, you are not forced to wait for action for long minutes. Sometimes a superscar or tacgun party can be good too. But i usually dont trigger them, rather let the players to do it their own way. Some of them prefer open warfare, others are hiding and sneaking, waiting for the moment. Its their choice, and i barely interfere.
Yesterday Florin said we should run a mix of Battleground/Savanna on the server. Is it possible? My favorite is Savanna, but sometimes players ask me to change - i understand them. Or maybe - if Yanek plans so - we can set a constant Savanna and a mix of other maps on the server. We never tested it, but there is a bunch of good vehicle-based maps like desert fox, new world(made by Yanek!), outland, panzerschlacht, pitch black, tank wars, valley wars, groung wars, grand canyon, and so.
Other option is to run infantry maps like steel mill, arktika, arabic city and many others.
Or we can try POWER STRUGGLE, too. But we may wait till IRAQ is finished.